The Supreme Court Said You Can’t Be Forced to Take Mystery Pills. Sort Of.
How Hunter v. United States created a new legal standard without deciding whether anyone actually qualifies for it. Munson Hunter told a federal probation officer he felt anxious and depressed while facing ten counts of fraud. He was describing the normal stress of being prosecuted. For that honest answer about his situational distress, a judge ordered him to take whatever psychiatric medications a future doctor might prescribe—without ever naming a drug, providing a diagnosis, or explaining why. When Hunter tried to appeal, the government said he had signed away that right months earlier in a plea deal. Last week, in Hunter v. United States , the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that appeal waivers have a limit: they are unenforceable if they result in a “miscarriage of justice” —meaning an error so egregious it would “bring the judicial system into disrepute” . This essay is not primarily about whether the Court reached the right result. It is about identifying a “failure mode”—a recurri...